<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NC&#8217;s new sex offender law is unjust and unconstitutional	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Fighting for registered citizens and families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gloria Wright		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/#comment-1160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gloria Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncrsol.org/?p=423#comment-1160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/#comment-24&quot;&gt;Michael A. Lewis Sr.&lt;/a&gt;.

I do have a problem with it.  It is ambiguous.  I am a treatment provider who has a large number of folks who do not understand a lot of things.  They would have lower IQ&#039;s.  You and I could probably figure out that going to The Children&#039;s Museum or the Aquarium is not a good idea.  Some of these guys would not figure that out.  It is very sad.  Some probation officers are very kind, smart, and reasonable with the offenders.  But, they can use things like this if there probationer is a pain in the butt, as many are.  They should list these things completely in simple terms or drop any resulting charges other than an actual stalking or offense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/#comment-24">Michael A. Lewis Sr.</a>.</p>
<p>I do have a problem with it.  It is ambiguous.  I am a treatment provider who has a large number of folks who do not understand a lot of things.  They would have lower IQ&#8217;s.  You and I could probably figure out that going to The Children&#8217;s Museum or the Aquarium is not a good idea.  Some of these guys would not figure that out.  It is very sad.  Some probation officers are very kind, smart, and reasonable with the offenders.  But, they can use things like this if there probationer is a pain in the butt, as many are.  They should list these things completely in simple terms or drop any resulting charges other than an actual stalking or offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gloria Wright		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/#comment-1159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gloria Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncrsol.org/?p=423#comment-1159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of the worst things about this law is it&#039;s ambiguity.  Many, many offenders plead guilty to indecent liberties with a child.  The child may have been 15 where they were 20.  15 year olds don&#039;t typically play on playgrounds.  Is this restriction based on the pleading or the actual crime committed.  Probably the crime they pleaded guilty to.  Do you see the problem.  OK, I also have to say I have always been apalled that sexually offending a minor child is a lessor offense than against an adult.  That is ridiculous.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the worst things about this law is it&#8217;s ambiguity.  Many, many offenders plead guilty to indecent liberties with a child.  The child may have been 15 where they were 20.  15 year olds don&#8217;t typically play on playgrounds.  Is this restriction based on the pleading or the actual crime committed.  Probably the crime they pleaded guilty to.  Do you see the problem.  OK, I also have to say I have always been apalled that sexually offending a minor child is a lessor offense than against an adult.  That is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: christina shue		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/#comment-26</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[christina shue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 01:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncrsol.org/?p=423#comment-26</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am wanting to know how this new law effects those not convicted of crime against minor. Are they now allowed to live near schools or go to parks or work near these areas..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wanting to know how this new law effects those not convicted of crime against minor. Are they now allowed to live near schools or go to parks or work near these areas..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael A. Lewis Sr.		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/#comment-25</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael A. Lewis Sr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncrsol.org/?p=423#comment-25</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[frequently congregate, including, but not limited to, libraries, arcades, amusement parks, recreation parks, and swimming pools, when minors are present]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frequently congregate, including, but not limited to, libraries, arcades, amusement parks, recreation parks, and swimming pools, when minors are present</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael A. Lewis Sr.		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2016/09/ncs-new-sex-offender-law-is-unjust-and-unconstitutional/#comment-24</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael A. Lewis Sr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncrsol.org/?p=423#comment-24</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anyone else have a problem with “Including but not limited to” of this law? what exactly does it mean? Seems like a loophole to be abused by law enforcement to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else have a problem with “Including but not limited to” of this law? what exactly does it mean? Seems like a loophole to be abused by law enforcement to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
