Comments on: 4th Circuit to NC: Got some statistical evidence? Anything? Hello? You there? https://ncrsol.org/2016/12/4th-circuit-to-nc-got-some-statistical-evidence-anything-hello-you-there/ Fighting for registered citizens and families Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:05:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: Tim https://ncrsol.org/2016/12/4th-circuit-to-nc-got-some-statistical-evidence-anything-hello-you-there/#comment-36 Fri, 17 May 2019 11:15:16 +0000 http://ncrsol.org/?p=548#comment-36 Point is rights abridged first and reinterpreted later long after ameliorated in favor of the state wrong. Cruelty the Inverse of the presumption of innocence. Timely speech, like the 6th- right to council, cannot survive substantive bar when absent in the record. One cannot waive right to contest via timely appeal of that which no judicial custodial certification exists in the first place. But that is the factual disposition of those facing ex post promulgated civil regulatory regimes.

This fact was expressed in Connecticut DPS when the court went out of its way to state “we have not addressed any substantive claims.” Plea bargains automatically waive these specific rights on the issue. This meant merit for a substantive rightfull plaintiff must come from those not under plea arrangements. Those differences are rare precisely because 95%+ are pleas of guilt. Some of the remaining 4%+ are absolutely innocent persons, DNA exoneration correlates this fact precisely. GIVEN: DNA exoneration exists do folks always get fair trials? Do prosecutors need actual sound verification?

]]> By: gamersglory https://ncrsol.org/2016/12/4th-circuit-to-nc-got-some-statistical-evidence-anything-hello-you-there/#comment-35 Sun, 04 Dec 2016 06:05:20 +0000 http://ncrsol.org/?p=548#comment-35 Glad to see the Federal Courts working for The people. Now to get sane people in the NC courts

]]>