<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Nothing inherently dangerous about living next to a registered citizen	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ncrsol.org/2018/01/nothing-inherently-dangerous-about-living-next-to-a-registered-citizen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/01/nothing-inherently-dangerous-about-living-next-to-a-registered-citizen/</link>
	<description>Fighting for registered citizens and families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim L		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/01/nothing-inherently-dangerous-about-living-next-to-a-registered-citizen/#comment-133</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2018 19:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=758#comment-133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope Mr. McDowell demands trial. What is perfectly clear is that banishment is being applied without process nor reason. I would also hope that when the sheriff has his meeting to &quot;dispel rumors&#039; Mr.McDowell has or is represented. 

One of the most overlooked problems with the SORs electronic registries is that they Only tell the charge of conviction and  NOT what actually occurred. This leaves the public to guess and\or presume too much. If one man would prefer to protect his family from something he must know what the actual threat is. Instead the lack of disclosure of trial transcripts renders the database use fruitless. I would like to know more  than a general threat, the details of a man&#039;s modus operandi are important are they not?

The General Warrant is one tool the founders hated and despised  about King George. Early on in America the use of the general warrant was rejected by the people as it clearly causes miscarriages of justice. That the US government has reinstated its use and applied it to convicted sexual deviants is reflective of both the people&#039;s desperation for safety in a society that provides little, and law enforcement&#039;s desperation to appear relevant before crimes are committed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Mr. McDowell demands trial. What is perfectly clear is that banishment is being applied without process nor reason. I would also hope that when the sheriff has his meeting to &#8220;dispel rumors&#8217; Mr.McDowell has or is represented. </p>
<p>One of the most overlooked problems with the SORs electronic registries is that they Only tell the charge of conviction and  NOT what actually occurred. This leaves the public to guess and\or presume too much. If one man would prefer to protect his family from something he must know what the actual threat is. Instead the lack of disclosure of trial transcripts renders the database use fruitless. I would like to know more  than a general threat, the details of a man&#8217;s modus operandi are important are they not?</p>
<p>The General Warrant is one tool the founders hated and despised  about King George. Early on in America the use of the general warrant was rejected by the people as it clearly causes miscarriages of justice. That the US government has reinstated its use and applied it to convicted sexual deviants is reflective of both the people&#8217;s desperation for safety in a society that provides little, and law enforcement&#8217;s desperation to appear relevant before crimes are committed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
