<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Federal court slams NC&#8217;s registration procedure	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/</link>
	<description>Fighting for registered citizens and families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:53:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dwayne Daughtry		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne Daughtry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=946#comment-361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-173&quot;&gt;CODY JAMES MCCLAIN&lt;/a&gt;.

I am so sorry this happened to you in North Carolina. Situations such as yours are widespread. Hopefully, one day, we can rid of this tiresome and unnecessary registry once and for all.

However, what is most disturbing is that the Cumberland County Sheriffs Department improperly listed your new residency in Massachusetts (MA) instead of the correct state of Maine (ME). Such careless errors on a computer could have created another unnecessary arrest warrant for failure to report to another state when it was the fault of the deputy entering the information into the computer. Additional proof that the registry is riddled with errors at the cost of registrants. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-173">CODY JAMES MCCLAIN</a>.</p>
<p>I am so sorry this happened to you in North Carolina. Situations such as yours are widespread. Hopefully, one day, we can rid of this tiresome and unnecessary registry once and for all.</p>
<p>However, what is most disturbing is that the Cumberland County Sheriffs Department improperly listed your new residency in Massachusetts (MA) instead of the correct state of Maine (ME). Such careless errors on a computer could have created another unnecessary arrest warrant for failure to report to another state when it was the fault of the deputy entering the information into the computer. Additional proof that the registry is riddled with errors at the cost of registrants. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=946#comment-360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was  registered as homeless in  cumberland county NC ans if your a homeless registered sex offender they make you report to the sheriff every day I don&#039;t think this is law I think its the sheriffs own added om requirement can someone tell me if its legal for the cumberland county sheriff to do this to homeless registrants?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was  registered as homeless in  cumberland county NC ans if your a homeless registered sex offender they make you report to the sheriff every day I don&#8217;t think this is law I think its the sheriffs own added om requirement can someone tell me if its legal for the cumberland county sheriff to do this to homeless registrants?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: john		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=946#comment-359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-173&quot;&gt;CODY JAMES MCCLAIN&lt;/a&gt;.

Same here I&#039;m from NY moved to NC and was given no due process or hearing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-173">CODY JAMES MCCLAIN</a>.</p>
<p>Same here I&#8217;m from NY moved to NC and was given no due process or hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CODY JAMES MCCLAIN		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-173</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CODY JAMES MCCLAIN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2019 00:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=946#comment-173</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I FOUND THIS ARTICAL VERY HELPFUL I WAS CONVICTED IN CALIFORNIA FOR A SEX CRIME AND THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND NORTH CAROLINA HAS NOT GIVEIN ME ANY PROCESS AS TO THE REGISTRY BUT SAID THAT I HAD TO REGISTER EVEN HOLDING ME IN JAIL FOR 401 DAYS FOR A FAILURE AND PUBLISHING ME IN THE PAPER]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I FOUND THIS ARTICAL VERY HELPFUL I WAS CONVICTED IN CALIFORNIA FOR A SEX CRIME AND THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND NORTH CAROLINA HAS NOT GIVEIN ME ANY PROCESS AS TO THE REGISTRY BUT SAID THAT I HAD TO REGISTER EVEN HOLDING ME IN JAIL FOR 401 DAYS FOR A FAILURE AND PUBLISHING ME IN THE PAPER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rwvnral		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rwvnral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=946#comment-172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-171&quot;&gt;Tim lawver&lt;/a&gt;.

Let us know what happens.  Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-171">Tim lawver</a>.</p>
<p>Let us know what happens.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim lawver		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim lawver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=946#comment-171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robin,
My 10 day time limit to return registration form has elapsed because the darn thing is still sitting on my desk. FTR case will soon result ( maybe 5 months) till I get arrested but the clock is running! I very much look forward to showing a jury 1) Judgement of conviction, 2 Wis. Statute 301.45 1g(a). If it gets bad I&#039;ll call Megan Marie Hass to the stand. She is the original complainant. Keeping you informed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,<br />
My 10 day time limit to return registration form has elapsed because the darn thing is still sitting on my desk. FTR case will soon result ( maybe 5 months) till I get arrested but the clock is running! I very much look forward to showing a jury 1) Judgement of conviction, 2 Wis. Statute 301.45 1g(a). If it gets bad I&#8217;ll call Megan Marie Hass to the stand. She is the original complainant. Keeping you informed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Timothy		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=946#comment-170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I suspect the usefulness has jurisdictional limits. Only Out of state potential registrants suffering Terry stops will simply be given court dates, so the question becomes can the legislature OPT for &quot;civil jurisdiction&quot; rather than &quot; Criminal juris&quot; in doing so? My state WI opted for criminal court to hand out the new local obligation. &quot; It is our state Department of Corrections that determines out of state potentials. Still Wis.DOC resides in the Administrative Branch, not the judicial. I do believe that was Judge Boyle&#039;s main point. Yez, Meredith waived in state A but not in B. That kinda thought goes way back to Dred Scott. I&#039;d say the judge has no real federalist taint.

That was key in Connecticut DPS v. Doe too, but the defendant had entered &#038; waived knowingly of civil right via plea and then arrogantly complained fed judge about state A&#039;s actions. He lost 9-0 as he should. This notion supports the idea that SOR is a form of plain indentured servitude, the electronic kind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the usefulness has jurisdictional limits. Only Out of state potential registrants suffering Terry stops will simply be given court dates, so the question becomes can the legislature OPT for &#8220;civil jurisdiction&#8221; rather than &#8221; Criminal juris&#8221; in doing so? My state WI opted for criminal court to hand out the new local obligation. &#8221; It is our state Department of Corrections that determines out of state potentials. Still Wis.DOC resides in the Administrative Branch, not the judicial. I do believe that was Judge Boyle&#8217;s main point. Yez, Meredith waived in state A but not in B. That kinda thought goes way back to Dred Scott. I&#8217;d say the judge has no real federalist taint.</p>
<p>That was key in Connecticut DPS v. Doe too, but the defendant had entered &amp; waived knowingly of civil right via plea and then arrogantly complained fed judge about state A&#8217;s actions. He lost 9-0 as he should. This notion supports the idea that SOR is a form of plain indentured servitude, the electronic kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Lawver		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2018/11/federal-court-slams-ncs-registration-procedure-for-lacking-any-process/#comment-169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Lawver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=946#comment-169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robin,
For lack of process?
Yes I can relate to that given I refused to enter into plea. No way I&#039;d waive my rights in any case especially knowing I aren&#039;t guilty in the first place. I most definitely remember that day I got stuck with DOC commitment for &quot;a indeterminate term not to exceed 5 five years consecutively&quot; but not at all present nor aware of the life time commitment to the DOC. While it seems reasonable for the state to make a web page for broadcast of the conviction is a different question than the question of the maintenance of same. IMHO the best case to present in the process\ equal protection question are those who refused to waive. If I recall correctly you also demanded trial. The right to contest even the civil is foundational.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,<br />
For lack of process?<br />
Yes I can relate to that given I refused to enter into plea. No way I&#8217;d waive my rights in any case especially knowing I aren&#8217;t guilty in the first place. I most definitely remember that day I got stuck with DOC commitment for &#8220;a indeterminate term not to exceed 5 five years consecutively&#8221; but not at all present nor aware of the life time commitment to the DOC. While it seems reasonable for the state to make a web page for broadcast of the conviction is a different question than the question of the maintenance of same. IMHO the best case to present in the process\ equal protection question are those who refused to waive. If I recall correctly you also demanded trial. The right to contest even the civil is foundational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
