Comments on: I have a voice

By: Tim

Tim — Tue, 10 Sep 2019 20:13:54 +0000

Pheobe,
Gee, your letter here is painful sweet. I cannot figure by what you’ve written what brings you here. I get no registrant vibes so I’m ruling that out. Anyways, The top issues in American society are in play here. Liberty is in play here. IMHO NARSOL , NCRSOL & eff.org are the tip of the spear in the defense of freedom from gov intrusion into the day to day lives of citizens. For decades now women have been striving hard to extract gov intrusion from reproductive choices. Gov and particularly fed gov, has zero business in the day to day. States are bad enough.

You are finding your voice with excellent timing as never before in human history have women had a greater opportunities for ” voice. ” Ask Hillary, Ann Coulter, DOC or Oprah for that matter!
That you have chosen to be here and question leadership’s choices means you’re contemplating standing against a tsunami. I trust you have awareness of the strength of the headwinds involved. The time has come for young folks to exercise their voices into the wind for such makes them stronger. You may not realize that humans are now in some ways subservient to database machine. That doesn’t sound to bad a thing to the average person but it is!
No rational person would accept human slavery to a database, and that is why the stereotype was created, for the sake of the machine.

I wish you enduring strength in what ever goals you have set for yourself.

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:38:02 +0000

NCRSOL, ROBIN & Company,

Sept 23 11:15 am Jury assembly room 2nd floor Janesville Wisconsin I will have WIS DOC SOR AGENT Fugate on the stand in pretrial hearing. I have convinced the judge to permit me to represent myself. That means I get to ask agent some key questions about probable cause.
The standard is very low so I do not expect to win dismissal on ground or lack of sufficiency but you never know. One piece of paper a1991 notice of conviction & sec 301.45 & 46 are in play.
Fortunately 301.45 1g (a) WHO IS COVERED contains a date December 25 1993 which is after the date on the judgment. State will opt 301.45 1g(b) the ex post ” a person who was in prison for…. ”
where custody is inferred as SOR now is. Remember Connecticut DPS mentioned the substantive claim not weighed. That question remains specifically only for those who’d not waived substantive rights by plea and demanded trial. That court referred to Norma Grace Constanteneau 400 US 433. A Wisconsin case where I happen to live. SOR in WI is administered by DOC that choice was not made by congress rather that intent filled act reflects punitive intent more than opting AG or State Police.

In many ways I hope this case gets to a jury because the inventors of the regime has blood and family destruction on their hands.

By: Raphael

Raphael — Fri, 06 Sep 2019 03:22:34 +0000

Well put. And thanks for your contribution here! Y’all hear her? Join NCRSOL! (See tab at top that reads “Join NCRSOL”)