Comments on: Opinion editorial questions State Fair restrictions against SOs

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Wed, 09 Nov 2022 01:47:02 +0000

In reply to Richard C Chandler. How dare they claim benefits for child rearing. That is going to be the key, as the founders knew. Nobody benefits from paranoia. Paranoia is not an emotion we need our kids to be feeling at all, especially when they are young. Too many young people fear authority and thus they get used or abused.

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Wed, 09 Nov 2022 01:25:21 +0000

Robin,

A tech domino has fallen and he comes in the form of a Mr. Gareriniof California.
The Mr. is a member of their bar Association. Recently the CA bar sent a formal letter noticing all of his disbarment. This man was active in Silicon Valley startup scene.
This is significant because discussion of the registration regime necessarily denotes the database underpinnings. It going to be very important for more of his dealings to come to light for the sake of liberty of All Americans. I express faith to that end. Take my gut’s word for it, such an investigation will tie him second hand to young master Salas of NJ and other crimes of the highest order. – Batman.

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:48:43 +0000

The database driven infrastructure, including state’s SORs, was built in haste and without the environmental studies normally demanded by the people before large infrastructure projects get approved. How ignorant does the Rehnquist court look now concerning the claim the registry database was an inert passive gov enterprise? Bullsh#t! Obviously the rush put through by the Byrne Grant folks played an important role in compelling states to jump on board the electronic registry train or lose a portion of federal funding. Take a good look at how the DDI has wholely enabled vast amounts of criminal activities. The DDI hasn’t incapacitated human trafficking & pimping, it has takin those kinds of criminal activity to a whole new level. And what about child pornography? Has the DDI diminished or increased the proliferation of that type of material? The answer is plain. Before the advent of the DDI mass shooting in schools and churches was a rare occurrence, but these days those atrocities are quite common. Do any of you actually believe the DDI played no role in that type of antisocial behavior? The concept of SOR was used to convince the people their leadership and big tech were looking out for them, that they had it all under control, but nothing was further from the truth. Today the people are more vulnerable than ever because they opted for network convenience at the expense of network privacy and security. How many TV and internet ads do we see by electronic firms claiming to provide security and safety. Too many to mention. Gee! I wonder why?

By: Richard C Chandler

Richard C Chandler — Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:21:19 +0000

I agree whole heartedly. Drug dealers,murderers, methamphetamine dealers ETC are not banned from fairs. I committed my crime over the internet through interstate online chat 14 years ago. Been off probation since 2012 yet I can’t go to the fair, Dogwood Festival here in Fayetteville or Festival Park for an adult event serving Alchohol because I am on The Sex Offender Registry. The Registry is a money pit to keep Sheriff’s Officers gainfully employed, making the public feel safe and rape the taxpayers of hard earned tax $$$. State funding and federal funding comes from tax payers. The public is no safer with a Registry than without.

By: Edward Stanley

Edward Stanley — Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:51:12 +0000

Laws and regulations that don’t fit the crime only inflict more hardship and personal termoil to those whom are effected by it. If we allow those whom commit violent crimes to attend public functions with no restrictions then all should be allowed. Punishment ends when you leave prison. Not for your life time.