<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How the Supreme Court has promoted myths about sex offender registries	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ncrsol.org/2023/08/how-the-supreme-court-has-promoted-myths-about-sex-offender-registries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ncrsol.org/2023/08/how-the-supreme-court-has-promoted-myths-about-sex-offender-registries/</link>
	<description>Fighting for registered citizens and families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 03:19:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew F Fabian		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2023/08/how-the-supreme-court-has-promoted-myths-about-sex-offender-registries/#comment-7871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew F Fabian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 03:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=4765#comment-7871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ncrsol.org/2023/08/how-the-supreme-court-has-promoted-myths-about-sex-offender-registries/#comment-3269&quot;&gt;wilfred stuart&lt;/a&gt;.

its all about emotions when you are on the registry everyone sees the label in NC where it says child exploitation in the (whatever degree) and just assume your john Wayne Gacy but sell crack outside a school ,that&#039;s okay , not knowing that as NCRSOL points out most sex offender are family members, no the guy who found dirty pictures on a web site is the real culprit its narrow mindedness plain and simple get the facts ,and as long as people make that perception to them it is real]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ncrsol.org/2023/08/how-the-supreme-court-has-promoted-myths-about-sex-offender-registries/#comment-3269">wilfred stuart</a>.</p>
<p>its all about emotions when you are on the registry everyone sees the label in NC where it says child exploitation in the (whatever degree) and just assume your john Wayne Gacy but sell crack outside a school ,that&#8217;s okay , not knowing that as NCRSOL points out most sex offender are family members, no the guy who found dirty pictures on a web site is the real culprit its narrow mindedness plain and simple get the facts ,and as long as people make that perception to them it is real</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim in WI		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2023/08/how-the-supreme-court-has-promoted-myths-about-sex-offender-registries/#comment-7591</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim in WI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 09:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=4765#comment-7591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is so damn important to remember history! Who was chief justice at the time of the SOR regime&#039;s weighing? Where he was raised is important to his predisposition concerning constitutional philosophy and discipline. Looking back at Smith V Doe03 the minority attacked in the somewhat subtle way by pointing to a case directly implicating that yet disclosed upbringing. In short, Mr. Rehnquist was raised steeped in two  fundamental and formative trains of thought, Catholicism &#038; collectivist socialism (unionism). The case brought forth by the minority to confront that basis in Smith V was City of Hartford v Norma Grace Constantineau. That citing specifically annoyed Rehnquist because he knew the history of it. There was some technical question concerning Ms. Constantineau&#039;s &quot;standing&quot; to form her federal appeal in the fist place; the state hadn&#039;t weighed in first ( before the fed). Thus in that sense, it was embarrassing, for a unionist from WI to admit the conceptual and abhorrent faults of his upbringing. Catholics in his mind could do no wrong. (They&#039;d survived Nazism in Germany &#038; Italy) Keep in mind cops were unionized and Catholic too( Irish Catholics mostly). That particular part of the state was built by union labor, every house, ever bar and tavern, everything tied and dominated politically by to those two cultural dogmas.

To understand my point one must first be familiar with the history of Milwaukee and beer and yes open socialist thought brought from old world Germans and Dutch Catholics to southeast Wisconsin. You see in the late 1980s and early 1990s the Catholic church was under tremendous scrutiny as lawyers were filing suits about choir boys and molestation, and the yellow journalist hyped the issue. The ambulance chasing lawyers were cashing in on sex and cover-up and Cardinal conspiracy. In Smith V Doe, all the Catholics voted in lockstep. I believe they caved on the punitive question, but they didn&#039;t do it in a vacuum.
First and foremost what upholding did was optically divorce the predominantly Catholic Supreme Court from the Roman Catholic Church at large. If the Smith V Doe majority had rejected the regime or the ex post component, it could have been viewed as an extension of the Cardinal conspiracy. It most certainly would have been an unpopular choice. In my opinion, Here I am solely pinpointing the leverage applied to that majorities&#039; decision, not the money behind the act itself. For that I gotta talk big tech, otherwise known as purveyors of database. They were busy hyping their new machines plethora of uses and greasing the wheels]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so damn important to remember history! Who was chief justice at the time of the SOR regime&#8217;s weighing? Where he was raised is important to his predisposition concerning constitutional philosophy and discipline. Looking back at Smith V Doe03 the minority attacked in the somewhat subtle way by pointing to a case directly implicating that yet disclosed upbringing. In short, Mr. Rehnquist was raised steeped in two  fundamental and formative trains of thought, Catholicism &amp; collectivist socialism (unionism). The case brought forth by the minority to confront that basis in Smith V was City of Hartford v Norma Grace Constantineau. That citing specifically annoyed Rehnquist because he knew the history of it. There was some technical question concerning Ms. Constantineau&#8217;s &#8220;standing&#8221; to form her federal appeal in the fist place; the state hadn&#8217;t weighed in first ( before the fed). Thus in that sense, it was embarrassing, for a unionist from WI to admit the conceptual and abhorrent faults of his upbringing. Catholics in his mind could do no wrong. (They&#8217;d survived Nazism in Germany &amp; Italy) Keep in mind cops were unionized and Catholic too( Irish Catholics mostly). That particular part of the state was built by union labor, every house, ever bar and tavern, everything tied and dominated politically by to those two cultural dogmas.</p>
<p>To understand my point one must first be familiar with the history of Milwaukee and beer and yes open socialist thought brought from old world Germans and Dutch Catholics to southeast Wisconsin. You see in the late 1980s and early 1990s the Catholic church was under tremendous scrutiny as lawyers were filing suits about choir boys and molestation, and the yellow journalist hyped the issue. The ambulance chasing lawyers were cashing in on sex and cover-up and Cardinal conspiracy. In Smith V Doe, all the Catholics voted in lockstep. I believe they caved on the punitive question, but they didn&#8217;t do it in a vacuum.<br />
First and foremost what upholding did was optically divorce the predominantly Catholic Supreme Court from the Roman Catholic Church at large. If the Smith V Doe majority had rejected the regime or the ex post component, it could have been viewed as an extension of the Cardinal conspiracy. It most certainly would have been an unpopular choice. In my opinion, Here I am solely pinpointing the leverage applied to that majorities&#8217; decision, not the money behind the act itself. For that I gotta talk big tech, otherwise known as purveyors of database. They were busy hyping their new machines plethora of uses and greasing the wheels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wilfred stuart		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2023/08/how-the-supreme-court-has-promoted-myths-about-sex-offender-registries/#comment-3269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wilfred stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2023 12:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=4765#comment-3269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If all the evidence shows registries are not effective and punitive in nature, how is it no one has been able to successfully challenge them and have them ended? Why can no one answer this question? What will it take to bring them to an end?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all the evidence shows registries are not effective and punitive in nature, how is it no one has been able to successfully challenge them and have them ended? Why can no one answer this question? What will it take to bring them to an end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Bennett		</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2023/08/how-the-supreme-court-has-promoted-myths-about-sex-offender-registries/#comment-3268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2023 09:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=4765#comment-3268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All of these stories and reports remind me of David and Goliath.  One of these days one of our stones will hit between the eyes of someone and this monster that has been created will be deceased.  My sincere gratitude is extended to all of those who continue to fight for the many of us who can&#039;t fight.  It gives me hope.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of these stories and reports remind me of David and Goliath.  One of these days one of our stones will hit between the eyes of someone and this monster that has been created will be deceased.  My sincere gratitude is extended to all of those who continue to fight for the many of us who can&#8217;t fight.  It gives me hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
