<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grabarczyk v. Stein &#8211; NCRSOL</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ncrsol.org/tag/grabarczyk-v-stein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ncrsol.org</link>
	<description>Fighting for registered citizens and families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 20:08:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">165103099</site>	<item>
		<title>Grabarczyk v. Stein case harmed by N.C. General Assembly</title>
		<link>https://ncrsol.org/2020/08/grabarczyk-v-stein-case-harmed-by-n-c-general-assembly/</link>
					<comments>https://ncrsol.org/2020/08/grabarczyk-v-stein-case-harmed-by-n-c-general-assembly/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne Daughtry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2020 18:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grabarczyk v. Stein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Markham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC Sex Offender Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNC School of law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ncrsol.org/?p=4090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By JAMIE MARKHAM &#8212; In a post last year, here, I discussed some of the issues related to sex offender registration for out-of-state offenses. Among other things, I noted a federal]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By JAMIE MARKHAM &#8212; In a post last year, <a href="https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/sex-offender-registration-for-out-of-state-offenses/">here</a>, I discussed some of the issues related to sex offender registration for out-of-state offenses. Among other things, I noted a federal case in which a registrant challenged the constitutionality of North Carolina’s process (or, really, lack of process) for determining whether a conviction from another state is substantially similar to a North Carolina crime requiring registration. A subsequent case prompted a legislative change that is the main subject of today’s post.<span id="more-13369"></span></p>
<p>The background rule at issue is in G.S. 14-208.6(4)b.—a conviction from another state is a reportable conviction in North Carolina if it is “substantially similar to an offense against a minor or a sexually violent offense,” which are the main categories of North Carolina crimes that require sex offender registration. A version of the same rule applies for federal convictions, including convictions by court martial. G.S. 14-208.6(4)c.</p>
<p><a href="https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/new-legislation-on-sex-offender-registration-for-out-of-state-offenses/">Read the entire blog posting by clicking here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://ncrsol.org/2020/08/grabarczyk-v-stein-case-harmed-by-n-c-general-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4090</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
