NC Newspaper compiles mugshots and data on sex offenders each year
By CAMMIE BELLAMY . . . Sexual abuse against children has come under a laser focus in the Wilmington area this year, following the conviction of a former teacher and investigations into a local school district.
Last month, former Isaac Bear Early College High School teacher Michael Kelly pleaded guilty to 59 chargesrelated to child sexual abuse, including against students. The following weeks have seen a criminal and an internal investigation launched into New Hanover County Schools’ handling of abuse allegations, and a class action suit brought by six of Kelly’s victims.
After Kelly serves his time in prison — between 17.6 and 31.8 years — he will be required to register as a sex offender for the next 30 years. A StarNews review of state data found that offenses against children are the most common convictions for sex offenders who live in the area.
Each year, the StarNews compiles mugshots of sex offenders for every ZIP code in New Hanover, Brunswick and Pender counties. Those images, as well as addresses and other information about offenders, are publicly available via the N.C. Sex Offender Registry.
Who ends up on the registry?
North Carolina established its registry in 1996, two years after Congress created the first federal law governing sex offender registration. In 1996, it updated the rules with Megan’s Law, mandating public disclosure of information about sex offenders to protect the public.
To end up on North Carolina’s registry, you must be convicted of a sexually violent offense or offense against a minor.
Of the 611 offenders who live in the Wilmington tri-county area, a sizeable proportion were convicted of crimes against children.
A breakdown of the data shows those 611 offenders were registered for 672 separate offenses (people convicted for multiple offenses may appear on the list several times). Of those, 150 were convicted outside of North Carolina.
But on the list of convictions for offenders convicted in-state, “indecent liberties with a minor” appears 289 times. The second-most common conviction on the list is sexual battery, appearing 44 times.
Of the 522 convictions local offenders racked up in-state, 360 were for crimes against a minor — more than two-thirds of the offenses.
Amy Feath, director of the Carousel Center in Wilmington, said when an instance of child sexual abuse receives press, the public often immediately brands the perpetrator a pedophile. But the causes of child sexual abuse, she said, often have more to do with the power structures that allowed the offender — be they a guardian, a teacher, or a coach — to victimize that child.
While pedophilia is a specific psychological diagnosis, an abuser needs just three things to offend: the motivation or desire to commit a crime, an opportunity, and a vulnerable victim.
“Any kind of sexual crime is generally not about the sex act, it is simply the degradation and the power and control issue,” Feath said. “In every society, the most vulnerable pieces of your society are going to be your youngest and your oldest.”
Where can offenders live?
State statute also mandates that any person on the registry not live within 1,000 feet of a school. But that restriction only applies to people convicted after August 2006.
That means many sex offenders registered in the Wilmington area would be exempt. Those include a man registered on Chestnut Street, convicted in 2002 of indecent liberties with a minor, who lives roughly 500 feet from New Hanover High School.
Offenders who committed crimes against children are not allowed to visit places where children frequently congregate, like certain libraries and parks, when children are present. But the state does not have a residency restriction for those types of places, meaning offenders can live any distance from them. A cursory search of the sex offender registry located a handful of offenders living within steps of Ogden Park, Greenfield Lake, Legion Stadium and Brunswick Nature Park.
In the vast majority of cases, offenders are located well away from schools are parks, and the residency restrictions can even make it difficult for some to find housing. The registry shows instances of multiple offenders living in a single home in the Wilmington area, or registering a hotel room as their official address.
Feath cautioned that the old “Stranger Danger” mentality, that teaches children to be wary of adults they don’t know, doesn’t help children identify signs of abuse from trusted adults.
“I always say to people, I’m not as worried about the ones on the registry, I’m worried about the ones who didn’t get caught yet, of which there are many,” she said.
How should we use it?
As Feath said, the registry should not be used as a tool to harass or persecute offenders. It it another source of information with which community members can arm themselves.
“I think that it is extremely important that people are well educated about the sex offender registry and what does it have the ability to do,” she said. “The sex offender registry is simply one tool that we use in safely informing our community, just like a fire extinguisher, just like a smoke alarm.”
Feath said she hopes the recent focus placed on child sexual abuse leads people in the Wilmington area to start having more conversations about proactively protecting children.
She would like to see children encouraged to use the proper names for body parts, and to trust their intuition in situations that might make them uncomfortable. Feath said she’s encouraged by the work New Hanover County’s Board of Education is doing to hire a coordinator to focus on sexual assault and harassment, and to rewrite district policy. She is also a member of the district’s Title IX committee, established this year in the wake of the Kelly case.
One of the most important issues to address, she said, is state mandatory reporting laws. Those are the laws that require people to report suspected child abuse, and include specific reporting protocol for medical professionals and educators.
“It takes a village to keep our kids safe,” Feath said. “You’re fulfilling your part of the contract by reporting.”
SOURCE: Star News Online
Catawba county does the same thing. I am a female and have my 11 yr old daughter living in my custody .after release 3 yrs ago my home was vandalized multiple times and i was threatened to be raped and stalked by male neighbors. I filed police reports and the county will do nothing to help…of course bc im on the registry…we have since moved due to myself and child living in fear .i recently moved to burke co where ive found out they require you to do things not even in law books and upon arriving to register was even told ” this isnt the county you wanna live in”
They tried That in Swain County and I told them if its not a law i’m doing it. They can do nothing because their Add on Requirements are Not law. If we don’t stand up against them they will keep trying to ADD on stuff.
I subscribe to the Star News. Every week there are postings in this newspaper identifying various individuals who have been charged or convicted of crimes associated with drugs or other crimes. Not infrequently, when you read the article you learn that the individual arrested has more than one previous felony conviction and frequently they are also charged with possessing a gun by a felon. If the article includes sentencing, they are typically sentenced to quite a bit less than 10 years with 3-5 years of supervised probation. Not always, but frequently. The Star News, however, has a link on their website that allows visitors to search for sex offenders by zip code. This link has been on the website for some time now. I received an 8 year sentence in federal prison along with 15 years of probation, and I’m one of the lucky ones. I was in court ordered mental health treatment with many people who got 10 years and life time probation. Not only was I required to receive mental health treatment, which I totally agree with, I am also required to submit for a polygraph examination every six months. Of course the politicians push the fear factor and the party line of “keeping kids safe” when the statistics for recidivism and the data of who actually abuses children (strangers vs. someone the family knows and trusts/family members). So, there is a lot of money being spent on the fallacy that all of this money and effort actually keeps children safe, when it actually doesn’t. So these people who are actually selling drugs, carrying guns, and shooting people, they don’t deserve the same scrutiny? An article in the Star News, Jan. 19, 2019 by Ms. Bellamy, states that in New Hanover County, there were 25 investigations into shootings in 2018 with 9 fatalities. Common sense would suggest that our crime prevention efforts are not based on facts but outdated, disproven myths based on fear. But, good luck in changing the law because any politician who has an opportunity to vote against the sex offender registry would be committing political suicide.
All this collection a direct result of the DOE03 decisions whereby gov opted to lend unfettered and unconstitutional USES OF DATABASES. The sexual oriented offender being the means to begin the “legitimate public interest” in data collection of citizens. If gov can indenture then the sky is the limit with respect to database use by everyone and anyone for whatever purposes. Very damn poor leadership by which all of the people suffer from the various unfettered use.